BH0-007 dumps | Real exam Questions | Practice

Here you will get up to date and valid BH0-007 dumps with real exam questions and practice tests that you just memorize and take the test and pass with high marks -

Pass4sure BH0-007 dumps | BH0-007 actual questions |

BH0-007 ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing

Study steer Prepared by ISEB Dumps Experts BH0-007 Dumps and actual Questions

100% actual Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

BH0-007 exam Dumps Source : ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing

Test Code : BH0-007
Test appellation : ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing
Vendor appellation : ISEB
: 25 actual Questions

That was incredible! I got actual test questions contemporary BH0-007 examination.
I prepared the BH0-007 exam with the assist of ISEB check instruction dump. it turned into complicated however typical very useful in passing my BH0-007 exam.

what's simplest manner to prepare and pass BH0-007 exam? had enabled a pleasant treasure the total at the very time as I used BH0-007 prep aid from it. I followed the study guides, exam engine and, the BH0-007 to every tiniest microscopic element. It changed into because of such gorgeous manner that I hold become expert inside the BH0-007 exam curriculum in depend of days and were given the BH0-007 certification with a terrific marks. I am so grateful to every separate individual behind the platform.

am i able to find state-of-the-art dumps Q & A brand recent BH0-007 exam?
I could doubtlessly recommend it to my partners and accomplices. I got 360 of imprints. I was once enchanted with the effects I got with the assist examine manual BH0-007 exam path material. I usually understanding staunch and extensive research were the reaction to Gross or any tests, till I took the back of brain sell off to skip my exam BH0-007. Extremely fulfill.

want something hastily making ready for BH0-007.
I am going to proffer the BH0-007 test now, ultimately I felt the self assurance because of BH0-007 Preparation. If I checked out my past on every occasion I willing to proffer the tests were given fearful, I realize its silly but now I am amazed why I felt no aplomb on my, antecedent is exigency of BH0-007 Preparation, Now I am completely prepared can passed my test effortlessly, so if Gross of us of you felt low aplomb just win registered with the and inaugurate training, subsequently you felt self assurance.

were given no problem! 3 days practise brand recent BH0-007 actual buy a peek at questions is needed.
I am ranked very high among my magnificence pals on the list of terrific students however it simplest came about after I registered on this for a few exam assist. It become the inordinate marks reading application on this that helped me in becoming a member of the inordinate ranks at the side of different considerable college students of my elegance. The assets in this are commendable because theyre precise and extremely advantageous for education via BH0-007 pdf, BH0-007 dumps and BH0-007 books. I am satisfied to jot down these phrases of appreciation due to the fact this deserves it. Thank you.

found maximum BH0-007 Questions in actual exam that I prepared.
I gave the BH0-007 exercise questions most efficient as quickly as in forward than I enrolled for turning into a member of the software. I did no longer hold achievement even after giving my adequate of time to my studies. I did no longer realize wherein i lacked in getting fulfillment. But after turning into a member of i were given my admit become missing grow to live BH0-007 prep books. It placed Gross of the matters in the perquisite guidelines. Making geared up for BH0-007 with BH0-007 illustration questions is genuinely convincing. BH0-007 Prep Books of different classes that i had did back me as they had been not enough succesful for clearing the BH0-007 questions. They hold been tough in truth they did no longer cowl the complete syllabus of BH0-007. But designed books are virtually top class.

it's miles unbelieveable, but BH0-007 today's dumps are availabe perquisite here.
BH0-007 questions from are excellent, and mirror exactly what test seat gives you at the BH0-007 exam. I loved everything about the preparation material. I passed with over 80%.

real exam questions of BH0-007 exam! Awesome Source.
Found out this top supply after a long time. Everyone perquisite here is cooperative and in a position. Team provided me superb material for BH0-007 guidance.

Need to-the-point lore of BH0-007 topics!
each topic and vicinity, every situation, BH0-007 material had been notable assist for me while getting ready for this exam and actually doing it! i was frightened, however going back to this BH0-007 and questioning that I recognise the entirety due to the fact the BH0-007 exam changed into very antiseptic after the stuff, I got an excellent cessation result. Now, doing the following stage of ISEB certifications.

Can I find dumps Q & A of BH0-007 exam?
I wound up the exam with a fulfilling eighty four% marks in stipulated time. Thank you very a super deal killexams. Through and thru, it hold become arduous to carry out pinnacle to backside test intending with a complete-time work. At that factor, I grew to revolve out to live to the of killexams. Its concise solutions helped me to peek some elaborate topics. I decided on to sit down down for the exam BH0-007 to profit further evolution in my profession.

ISEB ISEB Intermediate Certificate in

ISEB Practitioner traffic and solution structure | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

This seller-specific Certification is obtainable by means of:British computing device Society (BCS)Swindon, Se UKPhone: forty four (0)1793 417417

skill stage: advanced                          fame: active

reasonable: now not attainable               

summary:For enterprise and solution Architects who rehearse their intermediate stage lore to a case examine and might elaborate on the organisation and tactics required to maneuver an architecture correctly. This certification is pertinent for people that are engaged in any aspect of enterprise and solution architecture.

preliminary necessities:You ought to pass the ISEB Practitioner in traffic and solution structure exam. The exam has a one hour closing date and carries forty assorted-choice questions according to a case analyze. A passing ranking of 26/forty is required.Six years of IS/IT drudgery event, together with some architecture definition is advised. it is additionally suggested you dangle the ISEB Intermediate degree certificate, or hold studied the ISEB Intermediate degree Syllabus and Reference mannequin, and hold both TOGAF 8 or TOGAF 9 flat 2 certificate. practicing is attainable however now not required.

carrying on with necessities:None certain

See Gross British computer Society Certifications

dealer's page for this certification

e-checking out Brings ISEB courses In India | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

From March 2005 e-testing, one of the most UK’s main independent utility trying out consultancy organisations will now carry the ISEB groundwork and Practitioner utility trying out Certification classes in India.

“there's a growing to live hobby in British permitted training programmes in India. And what they exigency to present is a highly alluring, universally identified ISEB utility trying out qualification - now a twin certification with the ISTQB accreditation,” says David Rai, earnings and advertising director, e-checking out.

Rai knows organizations’ growing to live awareness of the inherent hazards connected to relocating drudgery offshore and the deserve to ply provider problems is neatly documented. He believes that an offshore ISEB licensed testing group offers clients the reassurance that drudgery can live produced to the required standard.

“ISEB certification capacity corporations stand a higher possibility of positioning their productsand services within the global industry and the British typical is really held in high respect within the European market,” introduced Rai.

e-trying out is the first UK certified training issuer, accepted via the British desktop traffic (BCS), to carry the three-day ISEB groundwork and ten-day Practitioner utility testing Certification lessons in India.

And after three years of running the main software testing basis course in the UK and Europe, e-trying out’s track list thus far suggests a 95% promenade fee.

The three-day direction may live delivered in quite a lot of places across India and carried out by artery of ISEB certified trainers. locations include: Mumbai, recent Delhi, Pune, Chennai and Bangalore.

TietoEnator Certifies Testers | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

January 14, 2002 08:28 ET | supply: TietoEnator

ESPOO, Finland, Jan. 14, 2002 (PRIMEZONE) -- TietoEnator is one of two Swedish companies authorized to certify testers in line with the ISEB basis certificate for software testing. The ISEB peek at various training may live offered in Sweden and Norway from January.

TietoEnator has its personal examine academics and presents the course to customers and personnel. it is a three-day direction, and on the conclusion of day three the contributors can resolve to buy an examination and win the ISEB-certification.

- they hold observed an increasing claim for licensed testers, and considering the fact that there is not any Swedish equitable for test, they hold chosen to deliver the ISEB groundwork certificates, says Thomas Klarbrant, Managing Director of TietoEnator examine solutions.

ISEB (tips techniques Examination Board) is a division within BCS (British laptop Society). ISEB presents certifications inside several distinctive IT areas. The purpose of ISEB is to raise the necessities within the IT company and to assist competence construction.

For extra suggestions, gratify contact: Kennet Osbjer, TietoEnator test solutions, Sweden, +46 706 24 65 33 Marit Saelemyr, TietoEnator Consulting AS, Norway, +47 553 64468

With over 10,000 personnel and annual net income of EUR 1.1 billion, TietoEnator is a number one service provider of inordinate price-delivered IT capabilities in Europe. TietoEnator makes a speciality of consulting, structure and hosting its valued clientele' traffic operations within the digital economic climate. The neighborhood's functions are in response to a combination of abysmal industry-certain talents and latest counsel expertise.

TIETOENATOR organization

DISTRIBUTION major media

This information became dropped at you by artery of Waymaker

TietoEnator, Espoo TietoEnator verify solutions, Sweden: Kennet Osbjer +46 706 24 sixty five 33 TietoEnator Consulting AS, Norwa: Marit Saelemyr +47 553 64468


TietoEnator, Espoo TietoEnator test options, Sweden: Kennet Osbjer +forty six 706 24 sixty five 33 TietoEnator Consulting AS, Norwa: Marit Saelemyr +47 553 64468

While it is arduous errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals win sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater Part of other's sham report objection customers Come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. They never covenant on their review, reputation and property because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer assurance is imperative to us. Extraordinarily they deal with review, reputation, sham report grievance, trust, validity, report and scam. On the off random that you espy any groundless report posted by their rivals with the appellation killexams sham report grievance web, sham report, scam, protestation or something dote this, simply remember there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of pleasurable administrations because of their advantages. There are a considerable many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their illustration questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Braindumps Menu

9A0-279 sample test | 000-602 bootcamp | 190-531 rehearse questions | 9A0-803 rehearse test | 9A0-084 brain dumps | PEGACSA72V1 exam questions | HP0-T21 dump | HP0-714 questions and answers | HP2-E45 examcollection | HP2-K27 free pdf download | CPM VCE | 9L0-504 cheat sheets | 1Z0-546 questions answers | 70-333 test prep | HH0-200 actual questions | PR2F test prep | AZ-101 rehearse test | 650-667 exam prep | 2B0-202 brain dumps | UM0-401 actual questions |

Kill your BH0-007 exam at first attempt! exam braindumps offers Gross of you that you exigency to buy certification exam. Their ISEB BH0-007 Exam will provide you with exam questions with confirmed answers that replicate the actual exam. They at are made plans to empower you to pass your BH0-007 exam with inordinate ratings.

ISEB BH0-007 exam has given another mien to the IT enterprise. It is presently needed to certify beAs the qualification that prompts a brighter future. You wish to residence considerable application in ISEB ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing test, in choice of the actual fact that there will live no eschew out of poring over. hold created and excellent way, currently your test preparing for BH0-007 ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing is not fierce from now on. Click Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for Gross exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for Gross Orders As, the will live a stable and dependable qualification furnishes BH0-007 exam questions with 100 percent pass guarantee. you wish to hone questions for a minimum of one day to attain well within the BH0-007 test. Your actual expertise to success in BH0-007 exam, confident enough starts offevolved with BH0-007 test questions that's the astonishing and examined wellspring of your focused on perform. hold their specialists Team to guarantee their ISEB BH0-007 exam questions are reliably the most updated. They are at the entire exceptionally acquainted with the exams and testing awareness.

How maintain up ISEB BH0-007 exams updated?: they hold their phenomenal methods to realize the most extreme late exams insights on ISEB BH0-007. Presently after which they contact their associates who're particularly collected with the exam simulator acknowledgment or sometimes their clients will email us the latest update, or they were given the most current update from their dumps bearers. When they find the ISEB BH0-007 exams changed then they update them ASAP.

On the off prep that you sincerely Come up speedy this BH0-007 ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing and might pick never again to sit tense for the updates then they will give you full refund. notwithstanding, you ought to ship your score admit to us with the objective that they will hold an exam. They will give you full refund brisk during their working time when they win the ISEB BH0-007 score archive from you.

ISEB BH0-007 ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing Product Demo?: they hold both PDF version and Testing Software. You can examin their particular site page to espy what no doubt like.

Exactly when will I win my BH0-007 fabric once I pay?: Generally, After efficient installment, your username/password are sent at your email accommodate to inside 5 min. It might likewise buy minimal longer on the off random that your answers laggard in control approval. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for Gross exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for Gross Orders

BH0-007 Practice Test | BH0-007 examcollection | BH0-007 VCE | BH0-007 study guide | BH0-007 practice exam | BH0-007 cram

Killexams HP2-Z26 mock exam | Killexams 310-876 cheat sheets | Killexams HP5-H01D rehearse questions | Killexams C9050-042 braindumps | Killexams C2010-506 brain dumps | Killexams 300-209 test prep | Killexams 250-504 braindumps | Killexams 00M-195 free pdf download | Killexams 7230X examcollection | Killexams 000-M227 exam prep | Killexams 000-765 study guide | Killexams 000-M30 study guide | Killexams 650-126 questions answers | Killexams LE0-628 rehearse test | Killexams 9A0-088 actual questions | Killexams 920-551 questions and answers | Killexams 1T6-215 actual questions | Killexams HP0-752 questions and answers | Killexams HP5-H04D pdf download | Killexams 400-051 free pdf | huge List of Exam Braindumps

View Complete list of Brain dumps

Killexams 9L0-622 rehearse test | Killexams 300-101 study guide | Killexams 190-755 rehearse exam | Killexams VCS-254 free pdf | Killexams 000-218 test questions | Killexams HP0-J39 study guide | Killexams 190-981 dumps questions | Killexams 1Z0-807 free pdf | Killexams 642-164 test prep | Killexams 1Y0-A04 cheat sheets | Killexams F50-533 brain dumps | Killexams 00M-232 questions and answers | Killexams 000-371 rehearse Test | Killexams 646-058 test prep | Killexams 700-295 dump | Killexams 000-533 dumps | Killexams C9020-568 free pdf | Killexams M6040-419 examcollection | Killexams 1Z0-877 rehearse test | Killexams EE2-181 rehearse questions |

ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing

Pass 4 confident BH0-007 dumps | BH0-007 actual questions |

SSL certificate revocation and how it is broken in rehearse | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

The Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) is the software system that allows to sign, validate certificate, maintain a list of revoked certificates, distribute CA public key. The goal of PKI is to enable secure communication among parties who hold never met before.

The most common employ case of the PKI are myriad of the websites secured with TLS/HTTPS and using SSL certificates to establish confidence for particular domain name(s) and authenticate the server side. Once the certificate is signed by the CA (certificate authority), it remains sound for a specific duration. When it’s about to expire, usually you renew it or buy a recent one. But sometimes you exigency to revoke a certificate beforehand, usually due to a private key compromise.

Certificate revocation is a process of invalidating an issued SSL certificate. Ideally, browsers and other clients should live able to detect that the certificate is revoked in timely manner, expose the security warning, that certificate is no longer trusted, and obviate user from further consuming such a website.

Let’s explore various approaches to address certificate revocation.

Certificate Revocation Lists (CRL)

Original design was for CAs to manage and publish lists of revoked certificates, so browser/clients can download them and compare against to check for certificate status. This worked considerable in the past when there were few websites and certificates, but given today’s scale of the Internet, it’s practically infeasible for CA to manage and for client to download these huge lists, whenever they exigency to check for revocation status.

CRL architecture introduces the dependency between client and CA infrastructure, making it prostrate to the CA server’s availability issues and downtimes.

Nowadays original CRLs are effectively ignored by just cessation clients.

Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP)

OCSP is an improvement to CRL and is a protocol for checking if a SSL certificate has been revoked. Instead of client downloading the complete mammoth list of revoked certificates, it can just submit a request to a CA server, that returns a signed response with certificate current status. OCSP is much lightweight, as only one record is retrieved at a time, and it can provide more accurate information, as contrary to CRLs lists, which are downloaded and cached on a client for some time.

Still, it suffers from many issues:

  • Additional dependency and query between client and CA servers during TLS handshake, that adds up latency.
  • Poor, unreliable CA infrastructure. prostrate to availability problems. The CA servers are targets for DoS attacks. laggard OCSP response adds up latency too.
  • Privacy compromise. Browser leaks what website is being accessed and who accesses it to CA servers.
  • Soft-fail behavior

    Given dependency to penniless and not-reliable CA infrastructure, browsers/clients usually mind to employ soft-fail (ignore) behavior, when they don’t receive OCSP response in a timely manner or encounter some errors, assuming that certificate is sound and allowing to access the website. Some browsers just expose warning, that user can bypass. Chrome, for example, does not employ OCSP at all, and employ its own proprietary mechanism, called CRLSet. The reason for such soft-fail behavior is because unavailable CA servers should not screen access to Gross websites, using their certificates.

    Soft-fail behavior gives us groundless sense of security — it’s OK when you win revocation warning, but when you don’t — you’re in doubt if cert is sound indeed or if there is an OSCP infrastructure related issue. For example, attacker can screen OCSP traffic and antecedent revocation checks to pass.

    Here is firefox reaction with SEC_ERROR_REVOKED_CERTIFICATE oversight when it gets revoked status from OCSP responder.

    Firefox and revoked certificate

    Chrome does not employ OSCP at all, saw cert is OK with a green “secure” badge, but if you dig a bit deeper, it tells certificate is revoked 😕

    Chrome and revoked certificate

    Right now there is no accountable artery to switch to hard-fail behavior. Essentially, revocation is broken. There are yoke of attempts to address this issue, dote proprietary mechanism (Chrome CLRSet, Firefox OneCRL) or OSCP must-staple extensions, but there is quiet no 100% working solution.

    OCSP Stapling

    OSCP Stapling moves the querying of the OCSP server from the client to the https server. The https server periodically polls OCSP server for revocation status of its own certificate(s), and sends OCSP response along with certificate (staples) to the client during TLS handshake in aServerCertificateStatus message.

    OCSP responses are short-lived (around a week). They are signed by CA, so client can confidence them.

    OCSP stapling approach solves several issues, inherent to regular OCSP approach:

  • Removes dependency between client and CA servers. No additional query, faster TLS handshake.
  • Protect website visitors privacy. Since browsers don’t talk to CA servers any more, they don’t leak browsing activity.
  • More resistant to CA server availability issues, since web server caches OCSP responses which are sound for several days.
  • Less load on CA servers, since number of https servers is less than number of clients/visitors.
  • Still, the biggest problem with OCSP stapling is that stapled response is an option and not mandatory. Clients don’t know whether to expect/require stapled OCSP responses from a website or not. If an attacker has a stolen revoked certificate it can live used without stapling. Browsers will fallback to regular OCSP, which can again live blocked, and browser will accept the certificate. They quiet hold soft-fail behavior with a groundless sense of security.

    Nginx configuration

    To setup stapling on Nginx:

    ssl_stapling on;ssl_stapling_verify on;

    Configure DNS servers so Nginx can resolve OCSP server IP address:

    resolver valid=300s ipv6=off;resolver_timeout 5s;

    Also, some folks point that you exigency to supply root and intermediate certificates chain via ssl_trusted_certificate , but I’ve tried and it works fine without it — I just hold a ssl_certificate directive pointing to a chain of website certificate plus intermediate one (without root CA cert).

    ssl_certificate /var/ssl/; Nginx issues

    The acerbic truth is that Nginx is not that pleasurable at handling and serving OCSP stapling. 😞

    First request handled by an nginx worker process never has a stapled OCSP response. Nginx initiates a faineant OCSP query afterwards, and subsequent requests will most likely involve OCSP response. Note, that OCSP stapling cache is per worker process, significance you can win several initial requests without OCSP stapling, as soon as they processed by different worker processes with a chilly OCSP cache.

    There are workarounds dote warming up OCSP cache beforehand, but that’s too much crap.

    You can check OSCP stapling on your own with a following command:

    openssl s_client -host -port 443 -status < /dev/null

    Valid OCSP stapled response should peek like:

    OCSP response:======================================OCSP Response Data:OCSP Response Status: successful (0x0)Response Type: Basic OCSP ResponseCert Status: goodThis Update: Jan 4 12:00:00 2018 GMTNext Update: Jan 11 12:00:00 2018 GMT

    There is yet another issue . When OCSP responder reports revoked certificate status, Nginx does not staple it at all, and they order it’s by design. Rather confusing to me 😕, because it completely breaks “must-staple” solution, described below.

    So you see, that current server-side implementation is far from being robust, and making otherwise pleasurable understanding quite useless in practice.

    Chrome CRLset and Firefox OneCRL

    A CRLSet is Google’s own list of revoked certificates that it compiles and embeds inside Chrome. Lists are auto-updated by regularly crawling the CRLs from the major CAs around the world. Google does not employ OCSP servers or CRL lists, instead Chrome simply checks its own CRLSet for certificate status when visiting a secure website.

    It’s dote regular CRL approach, except that browser does not exigency contact CA’s servers and download a list, instead it already has the list embedded perquisite into the browser, which is updated in timely manner.

    Surely, such CRLsets cannot encompass every viable revoked certificate on the Internet. Instead of targeting end-server leaf certificates and DV certificates, they focus on high value intermediate CA certificates. This helps to quickly screen intermediate CA certificates in case of emergency, when the private key is compromised to obviate an attacker to impersonate any site they dote by signing their own child certificates.

    Also, such lists might involve high value EV certificates.

    Firefox has analogue solution, which is called OneCRL. In addition, Firefox employ regular OCSP approach.

    Must-staple extension

    As said before, OCSP stapling is pleasurable because it offloads OCSP requests from browser to the server, but it’s optional — browser hold no understanding if stapled response is expected or not, and therefore they employ soft-fail behavior, which is a seat belt, that pretends to protect you, but breaks in case of emergency. So, meet “must-staple” extension.

    Must-staple is simply a flag in the certificate, that puts a mandatory requirement on OSCP stapling presence and instructs the browser that the certificate must live served with a sound OCSP response or the browser should arduous fail on the connection.

    This flag is set when CA generates certificate for you. If you’re using LetsEncrypt CA, clients dote certbot or uphold issuing certificate with “Must-Staple” extension:

    Example with (ocsp-must-staple flag):

    $ --issue --ecc --keylength ec-256 -d -d --standalone --staging --ocsp-must-staple

    Example with certbot (must-staple flag):

    certbot certonly --non-interactive --cert-name -d, -m --agree-tos --preferred-challenges http-01 --rsa-key-size 2048 --standalone --staging --must-staple

    To check if certificate has “Must-Staple” flag, peek for extension ID:

    $ openssl x509 -in /var/ssl/ -text -noout X509v3 topic Alternative, DNS:www.foobbz.site1. 0....

    Alternatively, employ Qualys SSL server test:

    Must staple uphold reported by Qualys SSL server test

    Now, given the certificate with “Must-Staple” extension, if I revolve off stapling altogether in the Nginx, browser should screen me with oversight failing to find OCSP stapled response during TLS handshake.

    ssl_stapling off;

    Firefox reports a cryptic oversight MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_REQUIRED_TLS_FEATURE_MISSING as expected. But Chrome tells cert is good — recall, Chrome does not result OCSP standard, even when it comes to stapling and must-staple stuff 😞

    Firefox and must-staple certificate without OCSP response

    Must-staple understanding is considerable and allows to switch to hard-fail behavior. Also, solution scales well and does not introduce client-side performance hit. And it makes impossible for attacker to employ stolen revoked certificate.

    Despite being a substantial improvement over regular OCSP, it’s not a silver bullet and not a 100% working solution. Primarily, it suffers from server-side implementation issues and exigency of widespread client support. If server fails to reliably staple the OCSP response, or employ corrupted/erroneous response, or client is not satisfied with stapled response, whatever goes wrong — you’d lock out the website completely due to browser hard-fail behavior. This is a huge risk, and web servers dote Nginx and Apache are not develope at OSCP stapling yet.

    Note, there is a experimental Except-Staple HTTP response header, which helps you to monitor how accountable you as a site owner can staple pleasurable OCSP responses, and how clients are fine with those responses, before switching to hard-fail must-staple behavior.


    Given everything said above, there is no ready-to-go 100% working and accountable solution to design browsers detect revoked certificates in a timely manner and refuse connecting to such websites.

    OCSP must-staple is considerable idea, but not practical due to server-side implementation issues, and puts a risk of blocking a website completely. Chrome’s CRLSet solution is good, but addresses only high-value intermediate CA certificates.

    When it comes to end-server certificates, you might resolve to give up with revocation stuff dote OCSP stapling, must-staple altogether. Just result security best practices. Reduce the validity era of the certificate and renew it more frequently, to reduce the time-frame for an attacker to employ stolen certificate. And yes, it sounds trivially, but maintain your private keys safe. carry out not allow CAs to generate private key for you, protect it with a password, etc.


    Revocation is broken —

    The current condition of certificate revocation (CRLs, OCSP and OCSP Stapling) —

    HTTPS Certificate Revocation is broken, and it’s time for some recent tools | Ars Technica —

    OCSP Must-Staple —

    The Problem with OCSP Stapling and Must Staple and why Certificate Revocation is quiet broken — Hanno’s blog —

    ImperialViolet — Revocation checking and Chrome’s CRL —

    Google Chrome will no longer check for revoked SSL certificates online | Computerworld —

    Damn it, nginx! More bugs, this time with SSL OCSP stapling. —

    Exploring HyperLedger: experience in Being a Framework Early Adopter | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Key Takeaways
  • Some time ago the OpenGift team explored deploying a HyperLedger-based blockchain within a production environment. This article presents a legend of their attempts to integrate it, the problems they encountered, and the tricks that helped us decipher them. 
  • We believe that HyperLedger Fabric is potentially a better option for blockchain-based traffic applications than a private Ethereum network.
  • With HyperLedger you can build a system where clients carry out not exigency to confidence other clients, and partners carry out not exigency to confidence other partners (but clients carry out exigency to confidence partners).
  • The network is effortless to expand and can exist without a parent organization.
  • HyperLedger is not free of technical drawbacks, and so live prepared to write a lot of supporting scripts for maintaining HyperLedger in production.
  • Some time ago their team explored deploying a HyperLedger-based blockchain within a production environment. This article presents a legend of their attempts to integrate it, the problems they encountered, and tricks that helped us decipher them. Several necessary updates hold been introduced into the HyperLedger framework, and so some of the challenges were overcome, while others quiet wait for a solution. 

    In the first Part of the article they elaborate why they decided to employ a blockchain to decipher a  business problem and why they chose the HyperLedger framework over Ethereum. The second Part of the article is dedicated to HyperLedger-based blockchain architecture and technical aspects of the framework implementation. 

    Why employ blockchain?

    We initially believed that blockchain was unnecessary for their business. After all, most businesses resolve their confidence issues by referring to centralized facilities or arbitrage centers. As a result, it took us a long time to resolve whether in their case a blockchain solution was needed or not. 

    Our platform is a kindly of web resource where companies can reduce their evolution time and maintenance costs by working directly with open source teams. They identified that for some customers it might live difficult to establish working relationships with open source maintainers and key collaborators. The criterion rehearse of resorting to services of in-house developers or freelancers for fine-tuning open source code seemed sub-optimal, because of increased project time and price.  

    With their platform they aimed to resolve this inefficiency by providing an ‘entry point’ and simple interface for customers to request and co-finance developing recent features in OSS. For this system to live sustainable they needed to introduce a appliance that would incentivise developers to fulfill customers’ requests. After some deliberation, they Come up with an understanding of ‘digital ownership’.

    The understanding was quite simple: a person who registers a project on their platform receives digital ‘shares’, which they may transfer to his fellow contributors at their own discretion. As the appellation suggests, their shares enable holders to receive a partake of a project income proportional to the partake of ownership. On the top of that constraint, they added a rule that any ‘outsider’ developer could create  a requested piece of functionality, and if this solution is accepted by clients, receive a portion of the project’s shares. 

    We wanted developers to deal their project shares as a valuable long-term asset, which inherently implies that developers believe it won’t disappear. They basically had two options: they could either postpone introduction of this functionality until they gain the community’s trust, or they could build a trustless system. The latter path would require structure a platform in such a artery that would leave the assets untouched even if the parent organization exited the business.   

    We furthermore planned to integrate the platform with numerous confederate organizations, which would outsource evolution tasks to their platform and automatically receive a fee when they are completed.  In an exemplar scenario, they would just provide an access point for organizations into their network through some simple registration process, such as API integration. Their goal was to design the process as effortless as viable to avoid Gross the legal complications and paperwork. After some doubts, they decided that blockchain would back us to realize this vision.

    Ethereum vs HyperLedger

    Ethereum was their first choice, even though they didn’t hold significant experience with the platform. They hadn’t studied the documentation in detail; they just got perquisite to spiking the integration. At first glance, it seemed dote an effortless choice. Several factors led us to give it a try:

  • It’s rather mature;
  • It’s stable;
  • it’s effortless to integrate;
  • it’s effortless to develop;
  • It has a big community;
  • It’s been rapidly developing;
  • It’s been used in numerous projects;
  • It gives an chance of private deploying in their private network.
  • One the other hand, there were a few factors that eventually convinced us that Ethereum was not the perquisite choice for us: 

  • Non-determinacy of the consensus algorithm.
  • Proof-of-work (POW) is unpredictable. 
  • Non-existence of roles.
  • Uncontrollable access to the network.  
  • Transaction fee and high CPU workload even in a sleep mode (minor).
  • Some of these issues hold potential mitigations in evolution in the Ethereum world. For example, the GHOST protocol modification may well help, but even in this case if owners of the major pools suddenly resolve that their branch is longer than yours, while your tanker with tuna is in on its artery to the destination point… well, the cancellation of the payment transaction may astound you, if the transaction is being conducted over a public (or shared-use) Ethereum network.

    In an extreme case, they may even hold a confederate whose node capacity allows them to outhash the total network, so there would live no point in using blockchain. 

    It was furthermore very necessary to us to understand whether a network member is a client or a partner. They hold to know this for sure. The Ethereum network does not uphold this feature, so they would exigency to build this on top. They certainly could integrate their VPN into the blockchain. But if they provide access to partners, there, naturally, should live a artery to open up such access. At the very time, they would dote to exercise control over who has access to their network and what they can win from it.

    A key takeaway is that it’s necessary to remember that within a business-use case corporate node capacities may significantly preponderate over private ones. This is why they opted for a private blockchain, using Hyperledger framework. 

    HyperLedger furthermore allowed us to avoid the minor inconveniences that they observed regarding the costs of transactions and CPU usage that they observed with Ethereum.

    At this time the HyperLedger Fabric was one of the most advanced and develope frameworks in the family. It furthermore has a few features that design it to stand out. The permissioned architecture ensures that if someone accessed your blockchain, you know whether they hold a certificate issued by a Certificate Authority (CA). They furthermore liked its deterministic PBFT algorithm, with which you can live 100% confident that a transaction is completed once your received such notification. Test launching on docker-containers is furthermore very simple.

    We tried to device out whether they exigency Byzantine Fault-Tolerance. carry out they really confidence their partners, and carry out they really confidence us? Can they afford to expose ourselves to Byzantine Generals’ Problem, knowing that at any flash any node could start sending incorrect data to the network? They eventually decided that they should hold such protection, and it was fairly effortless with HyperLedger. 

    Still in doubt, they conducted some tests to compare HyperLedger Fabric and Ethereum in a private network.  We coded a paltry constrict that generates a long array and then sorts it. You can espy the results on the graph below. They hold added two lines for 1 million and 10 million elements to the image just to expose that Hyperledger is here too. In fact, the disagreement is such mammoth that lines are actually invisible. 

    Y axis: Milliseconds.  

    Y axis: Megabytes 

    Now let’s respect the time required for reaching a consensus. They took a simple bare transaction and build it in a cluster of 8 machines. The machines had to reach an agreement and revert confirmation: they waited for six confirmations in the Ethereum private network and a confirmation from each node in the HyperLedger network.  The hurry was quiet better in the HyperLedger cluster. 

    Y axis:  seconds

    We should note that they conducted the tests on version 0.6 of the HyperLedger Fabric framework; as of today the latest version is 1.2.0, which has a sever node accountable for maintaining  transaction order. Back then, the network became frozen if you increased the number of nodes to 16 and the hurry to 500 transactions per second. At such pace the network was not able to reach a consensus before receiving a recent transaction request. 

    HyperLedger architecture 

    Before they promenade forward, let’s respect the basic architecture of the Hyperledger blockchain. 

    Peer - the main node, which stores information about Gross transactions (in version 1.0 it is divided into Endorser, a peer that confirms transactions, and Committer, a peer that records transactions to the register.)  

    App - the client initiating a transaction can live replaced with its own application on Hyperledger SDK

    CA - provides users with certificates that allow them to design transactions and read data from the registry

    Orderer - arranges transactions in screen and transfer blocks to nodes for recording in the ledger

    HyperLedger can sever nodes by roles. In particular, there is a peer that stores the register. In the 1.2 version there are several subtypes of peers, but generally peers are accountable for storing registers and validating incoming transactions. They store Gross smart-contracts and chain-codes, and accredit incoming transactions and deliver them to the register. 

    The application they built is on the frontend. It can ship information about transactions to the blockchain, and it can login to blockchain with a member certificate. It is furthermore accountable for consensus. 

    The CA issues certificates. By default, HyperLedger can distinguish nodes by organizational attribute; each organization has its own root certificate. With a membership certificate you can apportion rights on completing smart-contracts, rights on changing network configuration, and rights on adding recent peers – basically whatever you may want. In the newest versions of the framework, you can furthermore add any attributes you dote to certificates, so you can live even more flexible in providing different sets of rights to system participants. 

    An ordering service, or the “orderer”, is a set of nodes accountable for a transaction order in a block. The orderer collects transactions into a screen and sends this screen to peers, so they can entrust it to a register. It does not store smart contracts, though stores ledger data  in a binary file, which is used to bootstrap recent peer. Losing this file means losing Gross blockchain data. The orderer furthermore performs some validation: it checks hashes and signatures.

    For example, their system consists of the following elements: 

  • A web application, 
  • A peer, 
  • An OpenGift organization, 
  • A root CA of the organization 
  • An intermediate CA, which was designed with an understanding of scaling up the system; 
  • A cluster of orderers on Apache Kafka to which Gross confederate peers refer 
  • At the present moment, their blockchain is deployed on four actual peers, and they hold four orderers in Kafka. They ultimately exigency five, as it is recommended to employ an odd number of nodes for the ordering service in this mode. They hold approximately 100 client applications, 1 Root CA and 1 Intermediate CA. In the first several months of their drudgery they hold conducted over 1000 transactions, but their system allows us to process the very quantity in 1 second. 

    Partners hold their own peers so that they can store a register and validate transactions, and customers can advert to any peer they dote to interact with the blockchain.  

    Client applications log in to the blockchain by providing a certificate, which can live issued by a Certification Authority intermediate server trusted by blockchain, for example, “organization one”. CA Intermediate servers are authorized by a CA Root server, which is kept aside of blockchain network.   Then the client application can interact with peers within the framework of available policies, in compliance with restrictions and permissions. Once any peer confirms a transaction submitted by the application, and if it uses any consensus algorithm, it sends the transaction to the orderer. The orderer commits these transactions to peers. After that, the application can wait for any number of confirmations from the peers to design confident that the transaction was recorded in the ledger. 

    What is it dote to implement HyperLedger Fabric in production?

    Perhaps the first thing you notice is an absence of any simple admin panel. It's very difficult to maintain it Gross in production mode without Kubernetes or Swarm, so they had to write a lot of supporting scripts. Hopefully,  with the Cello project this will change for the better. 

    We faced several technical challenges while trying to implement this architecture. First, the orderer service can operate in two modes: solo mode and Apache Kafka mode. If you employ solo mode, you can’t switch to the scalable mode without re-creating the entire network. 

    Second, If you employ the orderer services on Kafka, you cannot scale it to other organizations. If other organizations already hold their own orderer services, you will exigency to reach an agreement on who will live in freight of arranging transactions in blocks. This means that only one organization can live accountable for the order of transactions in a block, which leads to some vulnerability. However, in general, if transactions are valid, their order in a screen is not of a particular importance. If someone changes the order of transactions and they become invalid, they will simply live marked as invalid in the block, and your request will revert “fail”.

    CAs (certification authorities) are easily scalable. Each organization has a root CA, and it can issue any number of certificates to intermediate CAs. This is considerable because the CAs are accountable for adding users to the network. However, the certificate revocation mode is not well configured. First, in order to request several parties to symptom a revocation certificate, you exigency to write an additional chain code. Second, even when you add information about a revoked certificate in a blockchain, the certificate ex-holder can quiet connect to peers. You hold to generate the certificates manually and add them to folders of peers and orders. Controlling that kind of process may live challenging in a decentralized structure.

    You furthermore exigency to maintain in humor that until the orderer has created a recent block, Gross queries to the register will revert the previous condition of the network, i.e. the register has transactional (versioned) semantics. This means that if you hold a traffic process that consists of multiple read queries and a write query perquisite after them that takes into account the result of the read queries, you had better design them asynchronous. Because in this case, your expectation of reading the registry will not live consistent with its actual state. In general, you exigency to wait for the orderer to shape a screen and ship it to the ledger; only after that can you ship read queries, assuming that the condition has already been changed. 

    Since the blocks are not created according to POW protocol, you can set any screen creating frequency for the ordering service. In solo mode, you will not live able to create more than one screen per second, and in Apache Kafka mode, you can configure this parameter quite flexibly. maintain in humor though, if you reduce waiting time for creating recent block, your network will augment in size quite quickly. Disk space will furthermore live consumed very quickly, and so you always exigency to find a balance between a hurry of transactions confirmation and your capacity. 

    The consensus mechanism is realized at the transaction level, so you can specify requirements that transactions will exigency to comply with to live sound in smart contract. For instance, when you introduce a recent smart constrict in the chain code, you set a procedure of its confirmation, how many participants hold to symptom the transaction for it to remain valid. 

    Smart contracts can live written in several languages, Golang and Java being the main ones. A typical smart constrict has the simplest structure. Only two simple methods are required to live used in smart contract: one  of the methods is called when a recent chain code is set up or upgraded (init) , and the other one when it is called(invoke). Different policies are configured to initialize a recent smart constrict and to convene it. One group of users can live accountable for updating of a smart contract; another group can live accountable for its implementation. Here they respect the simplest function call, which takes a function and parameters of this function as an input dispute and depending on the appellation of the function calls the needed method. 

    func (t *SimpleChaincode) add(stub shim.ChaincodeStubInterface, args []string) pb.Response { var cs clientState; clienState.Name = args[0] clientState.Balance = 0 strState, er := json.Marshal(clientState) err = stub.PutState(pName, []byte(strState)) if err ~= nil { revert shim.Error("Failed to add Client state") } revert shim.Success([]byte(“OK”)) }

    Data storage in HyperLedger may live considered as a key-value map, referred to as KV-storage.  Working with KV-storage is quite low-level.  With PutState() artery you can write in KV-storage, and with GetState() you read from it. But the most attractive thing is that you can drudgery in a smart constrict with the attributes of certificates. In this illustration you can espy how the hash of the public key of an authorized user is used as an identifier for his wallet. In the 395th line they win a hash and employ it as a key for KV-storage.

    func (t *SimpleChaincode) add(stub shim.ChaincodeStubInterface, args []string) pb.Response { pk, err := cid.GetX509CertificatePublicKey(stub) var cs clientState; clienState.Name = args[0] clientState.Balance = 0 strState, er := json.Marshal(clientState) err = stub.PutState(pName, []byte(strState)) if err ~= nil { revert shim.Error("Failed to add Client state") } revert shim.Success([]byte(pk)) } func (t *SimpleChaincode) query(stub shim.ChaincodeStubInterface, args []string) pb.Response { pk, err := cid.GetX509CertificatePublicKey(stub) strState, err :- stub.GetState(pk) if strState == nil { revert shim.Error("Client not found") } var cs clientState err = json.Unmarshal(Avalbytes, &cs) revert shim.Success([]byte(cs.Balance)) }

    Although, they are quiet using the 0.6 version of the framework, the newer versions hold some major improvements, which they hold to mention:

  • In the older versions, you needed to recreate Gross blockchain to involve a recent organization in a genesis block. Now it’s quite simple and you furthermore can change policies of working with blockchain for each organization. 
  • Starting with 1.2. version the system can hold its peers compute the requested information dynamically and present it to the SDK in a consumable manner. 
  • External applications can receive and process information about events from a chain. This feature may live helpful in a number of cases, for illustration - for notifying a controlling organization about suspicious activity.  
  • HyperLedger experience in a nutshell

    From the technical perspective, the system is quiet developing (steadily but firmly.)  There are some technical issues, but hopefully that the community will find solutions for them. quiet and all, they believe HyperLedger is one of the best options for companies looking to implement blockchain in real-world business. 

    On the traffic side, thanks to the framework they successfully realized the intended digital ownership functionality, which helps us to incentivize evolution teams to drudgery on open source projects. The network is effortless to expand and can exist without a parent organization. If they disappear, the community agrees upon setting a recent ordering service, updates the channel and continue working.

    Based on a feedback we’ve received, this capability facilitates adoption of the platform, since their users don’t exigency to confidence us and confidence on their ability to carry out business. They are actively looking for partners to hand over the nodes and design to undertake first technical integrations for their blockchain in early 2019. 

    About the Authors

    Yegor Maslov is the CEO of OpenGift Inc., platform for open source software monetization, Head of The Hive project, system empowering code reusability in organizations. Yegor has over 15 years of software evolution experience in web and mobile fields combined with an extensive background in technical entrepreneurship.

    Konstantin Erokhin is a DevOps engineer with over 10 years of professional experience. He worked in such companies as Kaspersky, Sberbank Technologies, Moscow Stock Exchange.

    Information security certification guide: Intermediate flat | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Experience can live the best instructor, but security professionals may find that instruction coupled with more advanced...

    certifications can back further their careers. While introductory certifications may back novices win a foot in the door, an intermediate information security certification or two may back them buy the next step.

    This report comprehensively reviews the current condition of intermediate security certifications, highlighting which are best for achieving goals specific to an information security career path. It's a companion to three other articles, which cover the vendor-specific information security certification landscape, vendor-neutral certification career paths and cloud security certifications in detail.

    Several changes hold been made for this updated cybersecurity certifications guide. The following table shows the number of certifications in the 2015 edition, as well as this 2017 edition. The overall numbers for vendor-neutral information security certifications increased by about 14%. Several certifications hold been discontinued, and 19 credentials hold been added. Some certifications hold been moved to recent categories to more accurately classify them.

    Some of the notable recent entries in this information security certification steer involve the CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst certification and two recent EC-Council certs: the EC-Council Certified Network Defender and the EC-Council Certified Encryption Specialist.

    Part three of this information security certification steer offers advanced options for more experienced professionals. Part four includes certifications for forensics and anti-hacking, and Part five covers more specialized certifications.

    Editor's note: The credentials are listed in alphabetical order within each section.

    General Cybersecurity certifications -- Intermediate

    (ISC)2 Certified Authorization Professional (CAP) The (ISC)2 Certified Authorization Professional certification identifies individuals possessing "skills and abilities required for personnel involved in the process of authorizing and maintaining information systems," according to (ISC)2. "Specifically, this credential applies to those accountable for formalizing processes used to assess risk and establish security requirements and documentation. Their decisions will ensure that information systems possess security commensurate with the flat of exposure to potential risk, as well as damage to assets or individuals."

    In particular, this credential confirms that the holder has the knowledge, skill and experience necessary to commission and maintain systems within the Risk Management Framework described in the NIST SP 800-37 Rev 1 specification. Candidates must hold two years of full-time experience in one or more of the seven domains of the CAP Common body of Knowledge. It's furthermore recommended that candidates possess one to two years of common technical, database, systems evolution and network experience, along with two years of common systems experience.

    Candidates must furthermore prove technical or auditing experience within the government, U.S. Department of Defense or specific industry sectors.

    (ISC)2 offers the Associate of (ISC)2 credential for candidates who pass the CAP, Certified Cyber Forensic Professional, Certified Cloud Security Professional, Certified Information Systems Security Professional, Certified Secure Software Lifecycle Professional, HealthCare Information Security and Privacy Practitioners, or Systems Security Certified Practitioner exam, but carry out not yet meet the experience requirement.

    Source: (ISC)² Certified Authorization Professional

    Mile2 Certified Incident Handling Engineer (CIHE) The Mile2 CIHE certification recognizes security professionals who drudgery to obviate attacks on their organization's IT infrastructure, and those who participate in incident response to successful cyberattacks. Certification candidates are expected to live intimate with common hacking approaches and techniques, safeguards, incident handling procedures, and techniques for quickly recovering from attacks.

    Mile2 recommends that candidates hold at least 12 months of networking experience, as well as lore of TCP/IP, Microsoft packages and Linux before taking the associated course and exam.

    Source: Mile2 Certified Incident Handling Engineer

    EC-Council Certified Network Defender (CND) Holders of the EC-Council CND certification hold abysmal lore of network security controls and protocols, and know how to manage outfit and appliances -- firewalls, intrusion detection, etc. -- that protect networks from attack. Other skills involve network traffic analysis, vulnerability scanning and assessment, network security policy maintenance, and creation of incident response plans.

    The skills required for this credential align with the National Initiative of Cybersecurity Education framework, and they map to Department of Defense job roles for system/network administrators. Candidates must buy a course and pass the certification exam.

    Source: EC-Council Certified Network Defender

    CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst (CSA+) The CompTIA CSA+ certification is a vendor-neutral credential designed to certify professionals who hold three to four years of security and behavioral analytics experience. A CSA+ commonly works with data collected by network protocol analyzers, network intrusion detection systems, and security information and event management software.

    For candidates climbing the CompTIA certification ladder, the CSA+ is the next rung above Security+ and just below the advanced-level CompTIA Advanced Security Practitioner.

    Source: CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst

    (ISC)² Certified Secure Software Lifecycle Professional (CSSLP) The (ISC)² CSSLP certification recognizes individuals who specialize in software security across the lifecycle, from conceptualization and design, through coding, testing and deployment.

    Candidates must hold at least four years of direct experience in the software evolution lifecycle in one or more of the eight domains covered in the CSSLP Common body of Knowledge, coincide to adhere to a code of ethics, admit questions regarding their criminal history and background, and pass one exam.

    Candidates who exigency the requisite experience may become an Associate of (ISC)2 by passing the CSSLP exam. Those obtaining the Associate credential hold five years to gain the required experience in order to upgrade the certification.

    Source: (ISC)² Certified Secure Software Lifecycle Professional

    Mile2 Certified Wireless Security Engineer (CWSE) The Mile2 CWSE certification is geared toward network administrators, systems engineers, IT managers and security consultants who are accountable for the security of one or more wireless local district networks (WLANs). Certification candidates must live intimate with WLAN security concepts, legacy security, common attacks, WLAN auditing and more.

    Prerequisites for the CWSE certification are the Mile2 Certified Security Sentinel and Certified Information Systems Security Officer certifications, or at least 12 months of networking experience. Candidates must pass one exam to achieve certification.

    Source: Mile2 Certified Wireless Security Engineer

    CertiTrek Group Certified Wireless Security Professional (CWSP) Made available by the CertiTrek Certified Wireless Network Professional (CWNP) Wi-Fi certification and training unit, the CWSP credential recognizes individuals who can design, implement and manage wireless LAN security.

    To obtain this credential, candidates must pass one exam.

    Source: CWNP Certified Wireless Security Professional

    EC-Council Certified Encryption Specialist (ECES) The EC-Council ECES recognizes IT professionals who can select and apply symmetric and asymmetric cryptography, common algorithms and hashing algorithms. A professional with the ECES credential can furthermore set up a virtual private network, select and implement digital certificates, encrypt a drive, and employ a variety of steganography tools.

    To obtain ECES certification, a candidate needs to complete a three-day course and pass one exam.

    Source: EC-Council Certified Encryption Specialist

    SANS Institute Global Information Assurance Certification Program (GIAC) SANS is well-known for timely, focused and useful security information and training courses. SANS offers regular in-person training, as well as online classes, and uses such classes to draw attendees to their frequent, well-situated, week-long conferences.

    SANS created the GIAC program to administer certifications related to SANS training. The GIAC program seeks to identify individuals who can demonstrate both lore of and the ability to manage and protect necessary information systems and networks.

    Overall, the GIAC program aims at serious, full-time security professionals accountable for designing, implementing and maintaining a state-of-the-art security infrastructure, which may involve incident handling and emergency response team management. Available intermediate-level GIAC credentials involve the following:

  • GIAC Security Essentials Certification
  • GIAC Information Security Professional
  • GIAC Certified Incident Handler
  • Global Industrial Cyber Security Professional
  • Source: SANS Global Information Assurance Certification

    Security University Qualified/Certification & Accreditation certification (Q/CA) Security University's Q/CA is for system certifiers and validators who exigency cybersecurity skills. The class identifies individuals who can assess security skills to certify and validate systems and manage the security threats within an organization, particularly in the government and enterprise sectors.

    The class has several labs on security controls and ends with a certification and accreditation validation practical. The Q/CA class meets the objectives of the National Security Agency's Committee on National Security Systems 4016A for a Fully Qualified Navy Validator.

    Source: Security University Qualified Certification & Accreditation certification

    Security University Qualified/Wireless Security Professional (Q/WSP) Security University's Q/WSP identifies and validates individuals who can architect and install wireless networks and manage and mitigate risk. Candidates must pass one exam. 

    Source: Security University Qualified/Wireless Security Professional

    About the author: Ed Tittel is a 30-plus year IT veteran who's worked as a developer, networking consultant, technical trainer, writer and expert witness. Perhaps best known for creating the Exam Cram series, he has contributed to more than 100 books on many computing topics, including titles on information security, Windows OSes and HTML.

    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Dropmark :
    Wordpress :
    Issu :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Blogspot :
    weSRCH :
    Youtube :
    Google+ :
    Calameo : : : :

    Back to Main Page

    Killexams BH0-007 exams | Killexams BH0-007 cert | Pass4Sure BH0-007 questions | Pass4sure BH0-007 | pass-guaratee BH0-007 | best BH0-007 test preparation | best BH0-007 training guides | BH0-007 examcollection | killexams | killexams BH0-007 review | killexams BH0-007 legit | kill BH0-007 example | kill BH0-007 example journalism | kill exams BH0-007 reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review BH0-007 | review BH0-007 quizlet | review BH0-007 login | review BH0-007 archives | review BH0-007 sheet | legitimate BH0-007 | legit BH0-007 | legitimacy BH0-007 | legitimation BH0-007 | legit BH0-007 check | legitimate BH0-007 program | legitimize BH0-007 | legitimate BH0-007 business | legitimate BH0-007 definition | legit BH0-007 site | legit online banking | legit BH0-007 website | legitimacy BH0-007 definition | >pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | BH0-007 material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure BH0-007 exams | pass4sure BH0-007 reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure BH0-007 security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure BH0-007 dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure BH0-007 braindumps | pass4sure BH0-007 test | pass4sure BH0-007 torrent | pass4sure BH0-007 download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice | | | |