the ones 202-400 existent test questions paintings terrific inside the actual test.
My pals instructed me I should anticipate killexams.com for 202-400 exam instruction, and this time I did. The braindumps are very available to apply, i dote how they may subsist set up. The question order facilitates you memorize things higher. I passed with 89% marks.
Get p.c. of understanding to prepare 202-400 exam. best for you.
that is to recount that I passed 202-400 exam the other day. This killexams.com questions solutions and exam simulator changed into very useful, and that i dont suppose i would hold performed it with out it, with most effective a week of preparation. The 202-400 questions are real, and this is precisely what I saw in the test center. furthermore, this prep corresponds with gross of the key problems of the 202-400 exam, so i used to subsist absolutely prepared for a few questions that were slightly exclusive from what killexams.com provided, but on the equal topic. but, I passed 202-400 and satisfiedapproximately it.
simply study those modern-day dumps and success is yours.
I used this dump to pass the 202-400 exam in Romania and got 98%, so this is a very noble artery to prepare for the exam. gross questions I got on the exam were exactly what killexams.com had provided in this brain dump, which is incredible I highly recommend this to everyone if you are going to rob 202-400 exam.
it is in reality extraordinary suffer to hold 202-400 dumps.
I cleared 202-400 exam with towering marks. Every time I had registered with killexams.com which helped me to score more marks. Its much to hold benefit of killexams.com question bank for such character of exams. Thanks to all.
Take plenary benefit of 202-400 existent exam and win certified.
I used to subsist seeking to win prepared for my 202-400 test that modified into throughout the corner, i discovered myself to subsist misplaced within the books and wandering a long artery far from the actual aspect. I didnt understand a separate word and that changed into sincerely regarding due to the fact I had to build together as quickly as viable. Giving up on my books I determined to note in myself in this killexams.com and that was the high-quality selection. I cruised thru my 202-400 test and become able to win a decent score so thanks very an lousy lot.
I exigency to bypass 202-400 exam, What exigency to I do?
After attempting several books, i was pretty dissatisfied not getting the prerogative material. i was searching out a guideline for exam 202-400 with effortless language and nicely-organized content. killexams.com fulfilled my need, because itdefined the complicated subjects within the simplest way. in the existent exam I got 89%, which become past my expectation. thanks killexams.com, on your top notch manual-line!
real rob a recognize at questions modern 202-400 examination are terrific!
a few extraordinary intelligence is that I passed 202-400 test the day before today... I thank complete killexams.com team. I surely prize the top class drudgery which you gross do... Your training material is super. maintain doing confiscate work. i will really utilize your product for my subsequent exam. Regards, Emma from the sizable apple
How long prep is needed to pass 202-400 examination?
With using excellent merchandise of killexams.com, I had scored 90 two percentage marks in 202-400 certification. I waslooking for dependable examine dump to boom my information degree. Technical requirements and difficult language of my certification modified into arduous to apprehend therefore i was searching for trustworthy and effortless testproducts. I had approach to recognise this net site for the coaching of expert certification. It was no longer an smooth mission butonly killexams.com has made this undertaking effortless for me. I am sentiment terrific for my success and this platform is much for me.
Passing the 202-400 exam with enough expertise.
killexams.com provided me with sound exam questions and solutions. the entirety was rectify and actual, so I had no hassle passing this exam, even though I didnt spend that plenty time reading. Even when you hold a completely basic information of 202-400 exam and services, you could draw it off with this package deal. i used to subsist a miniature harassed basically due to the sizable amount of data, but as I kept going thru the questions, things started out falling into location, and my confusion disappeared. gross in all, I had a incredible prize with killexams.com, and hope that so will you.
It was Awesome to hold existent exam questions of 202-400 exam.
Great coverage of 202-400 exam principles, so I scholarly precisely what I needed at some stage in the 202-400 exam. I particularly counsel this training from killexams.com to absolutely everyone making plans to rob the 202-400 exam.
The Linux skilled Institute (LPI) is a nonprofit company primarily based in Toronto, Canada, that promotes the utilize of Linux, open supply and free application. a technique wherein the organization furthers its mission is to provide vendor-neutral Linux certifications to IT experts everywhere. With "more than 500,000 assessments delivered" to candidates and four hundred practicing partners, LPI stakes a declare as “the world’s first and biggest supplier-impartial Linux and open supply certification physique” (LPI Their point web page).
With input from inner most industry, academia and individuals, Linux specialists provide input on exam questions to accomplish positive that they're rigorous, rectify and follow to any customary Linux device.LPI Certification program Overview
The LPI certification software is primary. It includes three certifications that build on one an extra:
every LPIC certification requires you to circulate one or two assorted-option assessments, each and every of which charges $188 and gross of which might subsist administered by artery of Pearson VUE. gross LPIC certifications are legitimate for five years.
moreover, LPI presents two different credentials. First, these just birth with Linux may additionally determine the Linux necessities certification a much foundation earlier than jumping into the greater superior LPIC certifications. 2nd, the LPI DevOps materiel Engineer credential presents these drawn to DevOp subject matters and tools an opportunity to set up and burnish such skills in Linux-based mostly environments. both of these certs are covered the sections that keep particulars on LPIC-1, -2, and -three below.LPIC-1: Linux Administrator
in the LPI certification software, the LPIC-1: Linux Administrator is regarded a junior-degree Linux certification that requires you to circulate two exams: one zero one-four hundred and 102-400. There are not any necessities.
The LPIC-1 101-four hundred examination covers system structure, the nuts and bolts of Linux installation, fundamental package administration, GNU and Unix instructions, gadgets and file systems.
The LPIC-1 102-four hundred examination tests you on customizing the shell atmosphere, writing and operating scripts, and managing databases and running SQL commands. You exigency to too comprehend a artery to configure settings for consumer interfaces and the computing device, fulfill administrative projects and control device features, create network connections and restful Linux systems.LPI companion Certifications
LPI and CompTIA hold a 2-in-1 Linux certification application, which lets candidates purchase LPIC-1 certification after attaining the CompTIA Linux+ Powered through LPI. (This software formerly protected the SUSE licensed Linux Administrator (CLA) certification – a 3-in-1 offer – however the third leg of that tripod expired in 2016.)
You ought to first win an LPI identity through registering on the LPI web page. subsequent, rob the CompTIA Linux+ Powered by means of LPI checks and argue that you want your exam rankings despatched to LPI upon a hit completion. you'll quickly acquire notification of your LPIC-1 certification from LPI.LPIC-2: Linux Engineer
The LPIC-2: Linux Engineer is an advanced-stage Linux credential that requires a present LPIC-1 certification as a prerequisite. To achieve the LPIC-2, you exigency to hump assessments 201-450 and 202-450:
The LPIC-2 201-450 exam dives into means planning, manipulating the Linux kernel, configuring system startup capabilities and boot loaders, and configuring and maintaining file systems and contraptions. you're going to even subsist established on superior storage materiel administration, networking configuration and device protection.
The LPIC-2 202-450 exam focuses especially on networking-connected themes, reminiscent of domain designation Server (DNS), web features, file sharing, community customer administration, e mail features and router configuration. The exam additionally covers protection issues dote comfy shell (SSH), port trying out and configuring OpenVPN.LPIC-3: Linux traffic professional
The LPIC-three: Linux commercial enterprise skilled is the pinnacle of the LPI certification program and is regarded professional degree. therefore, subsist positive you hold a few years of hands-on adventure installation, managing, integrating, networking and troubleshooting Linux in an enterprise ambiance.
To win your LPIC-3 credential, you hold to achieve LPIC-2 certification as a prerequisite and hump one of those 300-sequence checks:
mixed environment (exam 300): This exam focuses on OpenLDAP configuration, OpenLDAP as an authentication backend, and extremely superior levels of Samba administration, among other issues.
protection (examination 303): To pursue this examination, subsist inevitable you might subsist smartly versed in access controls and cryptography, in addition to software, operations and network safety.
Virtualization and excessive Availability (exam 304): This examination covers virtualization (of path), together with load balancing, cluster administration and cluster storage.
you could rob the LPIC-2 tests and an LPIC-3 examination in any order. That potential you could knock out the LPIC-3 examination of your alternative, then clique back and sit for the LPIC-2 tests.LPI Linux essentials
The Linux necessities skilled structure certificates (PDC) is LPI's entry-level certification. It does not role a prerequisite for the LPIC-1, but it's a much means for people who're notably novel to Linux to start validating their potential. The certificates is a noble faith for many different trade experts, from builders, to administrators and engineers, and records analysts. via gaining scholarship of for and taking the examination, you additionally gain certification prep journey, which may subsist a odds in case you select to pursue different LPIC certs.
reaching the Linux necessities PDC indicates you're conventional with open source applications versus closed supply, subsist alert of the fundamentals of the Linux working equipment, and can rush commands on the command line, exploit information, fulfill backup and restore operations and write primary scripts.
Passing a separate examination (LPI 010-150) is required to win the certificate, which does not expire. by means of present day standards, the fee is partially within your budget, coming in at a mere $110, making it pleasing to these interested in exploring Linux certifications.LPI DevOps tools Engineer
The Linux skilled Institute DevOps tools Engineer credential verifies the scholarship quintessential to accomplish utilize of materiel to permit and enhance collaboration in workflows in the course of the utility construction and techniques administration lifecycle. To create this novel credential (delivered in late 2017), LPI surveyed the DevOps “tools landscape” to profile what they designation “a set of simple tools when making utilize of DevOps.” This means that the exam zeroes in on functional, every day DevOps skills at the nexus of operations and construction.
Candidates should possess working abilities of DevOps domain including container and computing device deployment, application engineering and architecture, configuration management and monitoring. They may silent even subsist trained in such free and open supply utilities as Ansible, Docker, Git, Jenkins, Puppet and Vagrant.
Passing a separate examination (LPI 701-100) is required to win the certification which, dote other LPI credentials, lasts 5 years. This 90-minute exam contains 60 varied-option and fill-in-the-blank questions, and costs $200.connected Jobs and working towards substances
since the heart of attention of LPI Linux certifications, the titanic majority of linked positions are along the traces of materiel administrators, community directors, gadget engineers and technical champion specialist. but you are going to now and again stumble across job listings in the hunt for LPI certification for cloud administrator, cybersecurity engineer and technical schooling expert.
Some positions primarily search for Linux engineers with programming expertise. for instance, one organization turned into hunting for Puppet/Linux engineers to streamline Puppet workflow and assist with implementation and submit-implementation help. yet another position known as for an operating programs programmer who can design, boost and implement novel device equipment, and write scripts in BASH and Python or other administrative scripting languages.
Linux certification classes can subsist establish via many channels, youngsters LPI recommends that you just rob courses through one of its authorized training companions (see the associate Search page for extra particulars). The LPI Certification market is an internet rescue chock-crammed with Linux references, certification study guides, apply tests, courseware, video training and follow labs.
follow recognize at various Engine to resolve LPI 117-202- total one hundred forty four Questions & solutions
examination situation:- No-closing date- No-Random query- No-Random reply Order
NOTES:The goal of this APPS is to circulate the exam or ranking up asap.So the main contents are questions and solutions. no factor clarification.Please swipe down to reset the contents for iPhone or push the blue refresh icon for iPad.
start alternate options
All delivery instances quoted are the general, and can't subsist assured. These should subsist brought to the supply message time, to examine when the items will arrive. during checkout they will give you a cumulative estimated date for delivery.area 1st book each and every extra publication common birth Time UK commonplace delivery freefree3-5 Days UK First classification £four.50 £1.00 1-2 Days UK Courier £7.00 £1.00 1-2 Days Western Europe** Courier £17.00 £3.00 2-three Days Western Europe** Airmail £5.00 £1.50 four-14 Days u . s . / Canada Courier £20.00 £three.00 2-four Days united states of america / Canada Airmail £7.00 £three.00 4-14 Days rest of World Courier £22.50 £three.00 three-6 Days leisure of World Airmail £8.00 £3.00 7-21 Days
** includes Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Irish Republic, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland.
click on and collect is obtainable for gross their retail outlets; assortment instances will vary counting on availability of items. individual despatch times for each and every merchandise will subsist given at checkout.particular birth items
A 12 months of Books Subscription packages
delivery is free for the uk. Western Europe prices £60 for every 12 month subscription kit bought. For the leisure of the world the can suffuse is £100 for every kit bought. gross birth prices are charged in promote at time of buy. For more assistance please quest recommendation from the A yr of Books web page.
Animator's Survival kit
For birth expenses for the Animator's Survival materiel please click here.
birth benefit & FAQs
in case you aren't completely satisfied together with your buy*, you may additionally recrudesce it to us in its customary circumstance with in 30 days of receiving your delivery or collection notification e-mail for a reimbursement. except for broken gadgets or birth considerations the suffuse of recrudesce postage is borne by using the buyer. Your statutory rights are not affected.
* For Exclusions and phrases on broken or delivery concerns espy Returns aid & FAQs
While it is arduous errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals win sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater section of other's sham report objection customers approach to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. They never covenant on their review, reputation and character because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer conviction is imperative to us. Extraordinarily they deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report grievance, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you espy any deceptive report posted by their rivals with the designation killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protestation or something dote this, simply remember there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of noble administrations because of their advantages. There are a much many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their specimen questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
190-825 existent questions | 000-536 practice questions | 1Z1-051 practice test | C2010-518 free pdf | HP0-714 test questions | HP0-286 VCE | CMA examcollection | 77-882 test prep | DP-022W dump | NO0-002 cheat sheets | 310-302 practice Test | 70-475 study guide | HP0-Y25 practice questions | 70-564-VB cram | 650-752 study guide | HH0-280 braindumps | 300-375 brain dumps | 000-907 existent questions | A2040-406 braindumps | 000-M32 questions and answers |
202-400 existent Exam Questions by killexams.com
killexams.com give latest and refreshed Pass4sure practice Test with Actual Test Questions for novel syllabus of LPI 202-400 Exam. practice their existent Questions ameliorate your insight and pass your exam with towering Marks. They guarantee your accomplishment in the Test Center, covering each one of the subjects of exam and enhance your scholarship of the 202-400 exam. Pass with no uncertainty with their rectify questions.
If you are searching for Pass4sure LPI 202-400 Dumps containing existent exams questions and answers for the LPIC-2 Exam 202 (Part 2 of 2) version 4.0 Exam preparation, they give most updated and character wellspring of 202-400 Dumps that is http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/202-400. They hold aggregated a database of 202-400 Dumps questions from existent exams with a specific End goal to give you a chance to win ready and pass 202-400 exam on the first attempt.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for gross exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for gross Orders
killexams.com helps a huge number of hopefuls pass the exams and win their certifications. They hold a much many effective audits. Their dumps are dependable, moderate, updated and of really best character to beat the challenges of any IT certifications. killexams.com exam dumps are latest updated in exceptionally outmaneuver artery on general premise and material is discharged occasionally. Latest killexams.com dumps are accessible in testing focuses with whom they are keeping up their relationship to win latest material.
killexams.com LPI Certification study aides are setup by IT experts. Heaps of understudies hold been grumbling that an excessive number of questions in such a big number of practice exams and study aides, and they are simply drained to bear the cost of any more. Seeing killexams.com specialists drudgery out this extensive variant while silent guarantee that gross the information is secured after profound research and investigation. Everything is to accomplish accommodation for hopefuls on their street to certification.
We hold Tested and Approved 202-400 Exams. killexams.com gives the most exact and latest IT exam materials which nearly hold gross learning focuses. With the usher of their 202-400 study materials, you don't exigency to squander your chance on perusing greater section of reference books and simply exigency to burn through 10-20 hours to ace their 202-400 existent questions and answers. Furthermore, they give you PDF Version and Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its offered to give the hopefuls recreate the LPI 202-400 exam in a existent domain.
We give free update. Inside legitimacy period, if 202-400 brain dumps that you hold bought updated, they will counsel you by email to download latest adaptation of . if you don't pass your LPI LPIC-2 Exam 202 (Part 2 of 2) version 4.0 exam, They will give you plenary refund. You hold to route the filtered duplicate of your 202-400 exam report card to us. after affirming, they will rapidly give you plenary REFUND.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for gross exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for gross Orders
On the off chance that you design for the LPI 202-400 exam utilizing their testing engine. It is anything but difficult to prevail for gross certifications in the first attempt. You don't exigency to manage gross dumps or any free deluge/rapidshare gross stuff. They offer free demo of every IT Certification Dumps. You can recognize at the interface, question character and convenience of their practice exams before you select to purchase.
202-400 Practice Test | 202-400 examcollection | 202-400 VCE | 202-400 study guide | 202-400 practice exam | 202-400 cram
Killexams 250-410 free pdf | Killexams PCAT practice test | Killexams 117-010 practice questions | Killexams 250-402 existent questions | Killexams C5050-380 questions answers | Killexams Series6 cram | Killexams EE0-011 study guide | Killexams CCA-500 dumps questions | Killexams 1Z0-965 dumps | Killexams C2020-004 existent questions | Killexams 412-79v9 dump | Killexams HPE2-E55 bootcamp | Killexams HP2-B70 braindumps | Killexams 642-270 study guide | Killexams 642-654 brain dumps | Killexams 190-849 sample test | Killexams 156-910-70 exam prep | Killexams 920-352 practice test | Killexams LOT-804 free pdf | Killexams JN0-522 test questions |
Killexams 00M-602 VCE | Killexams 250-271 questions and answers | Killexams 1Z0-859 exam prep | Killexams 1Z0-809 mock exam | Killexams 190-800 free pdf | Killexams 000-347 test questions | Killexams ISTQB-Advanced-Level-3 practice questions | Killexams M2110-670 test prep | Killexams PMBOK-5th existent questions | Killexams 4H0-712 bootcamp | Killexams 156-315-71 brain dumps | Killexams HP0-D24 cheat sheets | Killexams 000-258 free pdf download | Killexams 190-720 test prep | Killexams 000-556 exam prep | Killexams 9A0-045 braindumps | Killexams 700-551 existent questions | Killexams 700-265 practice test | Killexams ST0-095 study guide | Killexams 1Z0-514 brain dumps |
Practice Test Engine to study LPI 117-202- Total 144 Questions & Answers
Exam Condition:- No-Time Limit- No-Random Question- No-Random reply Order
NOTES:The purpose of this APPS is to pass the exam or score up asap.So the main contents are questions and answers. no detail explanation.Please swipe down to reset the contents for iPhone or push the blue refresh icon for iPad.
ExclusiveEnthusiasts hold questioned Consumer Reports' assessments of Apple's products for many years. After looking at the test facilities, AppleInsider talked to Consumer Reports leaders about the various controversies of the past.
On May 17, AppleInsider paid a visit to the Consumer Reports offices and testing facility in Yonkers, N.Y., where they got an inside recognize at how the organization arrives at its conclusions about products.
When they sat down with the Consumer Reports decision-makers, one of the topics of discussion was the organization's past assessments of Apple products, including a progression of controversies involving individual conclusions about the 2016 MacBook Pro and the HomePod in early 2017."Biased for consumers"
Everyone they spoke with at Consumer Reports adamantly denied that they hold been unfair to Apple, arguing that their mission and methodology is entirely analytical and data-driven.
Accusations of warp or unfairness to inevitable companies, a Consumer Reports spokesperson noted, is "not a unique complaint." In fact, there were times when Consumer Reports has been accused of warp in the other direction — of liking Apple and its products too much.
"We believe that they hold certainly been just when it comes to Apple products and they haven't treated them any differently than anyone else,'" said Jennifer Shecter, CR's Senior Director, Content impact & Corporate Outreach. "We test more than 7,000 products and services every separate year, and I deal with every company who has an issue and they drawl well, why Do you dote Apple so much more than you dote my product.' or you hold other companies who drawl "why don't you dote [mine].'"
"But this not a question of preference," said Shecter. "This is a question of scientific evaluation and comparative testing. It is not about preference, that does not approach into play into their testing."
"We deal every company and every product the identical way. And it's been dote that since 1936," Shecter added. "We deal with Apple products and Apple as a company the identical artery they deal with every other company. Empirically speaking, they evaluate every product as it comes, and every piece of feedback from the manufacturer as it comes, and that is their process. So they hold had robust dialogue with Apple, throughout the processes, and they are responsive to feedback that they win from companies, too."
According to Consumer Reports' director of communications Barrie Rosen, the organization currently recommends Apple products in the categories of smartwatches, smartphones, tablets, streaming media devices, smart speakers, laptops, and all-in-one desktop computers — just about every category in which Apple offers products.
As far as device usage goes, while touring Consumer Reports' offices, they did note that the desktop computers are PCs. However, they did espy quite a few MacBooks on desks there, and when they met with the company personnel in a conference room, at least two had MacBooks in front of them. As for smartphones, they noticed about a 50/50 split between iPhones and Android devices in the offices.Apple and Consumer Reports
As for Apple and Consumer Reports' relationship, they Do hold one, and judging by the team's comments about it, it's somewhere between cordial and cooperative.
"We hold an ongoing dialogue with Apple," Shecter said. "Whenever they hold a chronicle that's coming out that we're going to muster Apple out — just dote they would any other manufacturer — they muster them. And when they hold questions, they reply them.
Consumer Reports' says that their direct dealings with Apple are with gross sorts of different Apple personnel. Sometimes they talk to marketing people, sometimes product managers, and occasionally even engineers.
"It might start with a product manager," Maria Rerecich, director of the electronics testing team, said. "But we've often wind up in dialogue with the engineers on the product, because they hold specific technical questions that they exigency to subsist asking and hearing their answers to. We'll depart engineer-to-engineer at that point.
Shecter added that the companies' communications are usually done over the phone and that in-person meetings with Apple are less common, mostly because the two companies are headquartered on antithetical coasts.
"As they do, they invite manufacturers to approach and visit their facility. We're always keen to depart to other manufacturers' facilities," she said.
"I deem that when we've been in dialogue with them it's been noble faith on both sides," said Shecter. "There hold been times when we've had to subsist in constant contact if there's a chronicle coming out, or if there's more stories coming out, but every time they hold a question they reply their questions, truly, honestly, and responsively."The MacBook Pro Story
One of those times dialog was needed was following the release of Consumer Reports assessment of the 2016 MacBook Pro.
As AppleInsider reported in December of 2016, CR, upon the release of the newly refreshed MacBook Pro line, declined to recommend the novel product, the first time it didn't recommend the MacBook Pro. Its determination was reversed the following month, following lengthy engagement with Apple and the release of a software fix.
The problem, it turned out, was that Consumer Reports had turned off caching prior to running the test, leading to the exposure of a battery bug that Apple later fixed. Apple said in public comments at the time that this resetting was "not a setting used by customers and does not reflect real-world usage."
The team at Consumer Reports gave us their side of what happened in that product assessment. Their engagement with Apple involved extensive communications, over the Christmas holiday that year.
"We rush battery life tests on laptops," Maria Rerecich said. "And the artery they rush the battery life test is, they are doing a website cycle over Wi-Fi. They don't rush those live over Wi-Fi, they hold a server with the webpages stored on it so it's consistent and their testing has to subsist the identical from time to time. So they don't want to encounter the vagaries of someone's website being down. So they hold the webpages stored, they rush those over wi-fi from their server, to the test machines, and we're basically cycling through webpages."
"We start with the computers fully charged, they set them gross to the identical brightness level, so again it's consistent across. So just let em rush overnight, and then some, depending on [how long they last]," added Rerecich. "We log that recording, and basically once the laptop dies the watch stops, so they can recount exactly when it's petered out. They rush that once, they record the results, and they rush it a second time. we're looking for consistency within five or ten percent."
"We set them up the identical as much as possible, they depart with default settings largely, but hold turned the cache off, and the reason they eddy the cache off is because they don't want the website to subsist sitting in cache on the machine because then it's not exercising properly," Rerecich continued.
"In the case of the MacBook Pro, that year , when they rush the two trials of the identical test, they might win 14 hours and 14.1 hours. They may win 16 hours and then 16.3 hours. If it's more than that 5 percent variation, we'll rush it a third time and espy where it falls. The case of the MacBook, they got 10 hours, then they got 4 hours. They never espy a variation dote that. This was completely unusual. And the numbers told us that there's something going on. They were not able to evaluate that battery as a result, because what's the prerogative number?' And they felt that based on that testing, there was something that was not explained, and they could not recommend the model as a result. They got in feel with Apple and they had a lot of back and forth with Apple."
"We got in feel with them beforehand and asked them for a comment," Shechter said. "Because they said we're seeing this issue, and it's gonna impact their capacity to recommend the product. And what they told us for the chronicle was they didn't know why that would be. They didn't understand why they were getting the results they were getting. So they asked them and they gave us a remark for the story. They published their chronicle and then there had more questions about trying to figure out what the problem could be. So that was over Christmas, the year before [last], and they probably talked to them every separate day of that Christmas holiday."
Eventually, CR gave their log of the test to Apple, who determined what had happened.
"Because you're doing it the artery you are doing it, there's a bug being triggered in Safari," Shechter said they were told by Apple. "When you eddy the cache off, this bug is being triggered. And while they respectfully disagree with you that this is a real-world test, or that this is the best indicator, they said you know, they want to accomplish positive to them the recommendation seemed important, and so they went back and forth, and they decided to issue an update for the bug, and so they issued it, and they re-ran the tests, and it worked. So they were able to recommend it."
Shechter added that CR's policy is that they will revisit product assessments after they hold denied a recommendation for a specific reason, once the issue behind that reason has been fixed. But they will not retest products that hold already been recommended. If they did that, she said, "we'd subsist re-resting products gross the time and we'd never even win to novel products."
Consumer Reports sees the back and forth with Apple as an instance in which they and a manufacturer worked together to deliver a positive result for consumers.The HomePod issue
Another rather contentious issue was Consumer Reports' assessment, this past February, of the HomePod speaker, "The Apple HomePod Sounds Good, but Other Smart Speakers Sound Better." Many, including AppleInsider, had taken issue with CR's determination that the HomePod fell below such competitors as the Sonos One and Google Home Max. Their editorial too questioned how Consumer Reports had reached some a determination in what appeared to subsist a separate day.
CR responded to that editorial that week, concluding with an invitation to visit their facilities.
During that visit, the CR staffers further filled us in on what happened when they wrote about the HomePod. The assessment was, they said, a "first look" —a collection of initial impressions of a product that Consumer Reports often publishes for inevitable high-profile products releases, including most iPhone and Galaxy devices. First recognize assessments will too sometimes rob recognize at new, highly-touted features — such as the visage ID that debuted in the iPhone X — and too recognize at whether the product does inevitable things that it advertises doing.
"Because consumers will subsist very interested in a phone dote that or a phone dote the flagship Samsung phones or things of that nature, they will try to win results out the first day," Recevich said. "So we'll Do this first recognize character of thing, with really big, essential products that people are buzzing about. Because consumers want to know, with Consumer Reports- everyone else is talking about it, why aren't you talking about it? So that's why they did that for the HomePod —not because it was Apple, but because these are the types of products that people are [interested in] —when the Apple Watch first came out, they did that. But they Do it for other products as well.
"Because the HomePod was sort of a fiery product and they knew a lot of people were interested in what it was dote and how it was. They did what was called a first look," Recevich continued. "In this case it wasn't a rented sample because they didn't hold that available, but the first day they got them in, they did some testing, so that they could give an impression about it."
The first looks are usually presented as "early test results." Consumer Reports has published day-of-release first looks of the iPhone X, the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus, the 2016 Apple Watch and the Samsung Galaxy S 8. CR does not parade to hold published first looks upon the releases of the Sonos One or Google Home Max.
"Typically on a first day, those first looks that they do, we'll win the product in, we'll rush it into the lab." said Rerecich. "We'll Do the testing that we'll accomplish on the first day, and then we're gonna win together with editorial and talk about what they saw, what the results were, we'll require questions, and we'll refine what that first day chronicle is about."
"We did a listening test. They actually ran through their entire audio character evaluation that day, and that was the basis of the first look, along with how it is to drudgery with, and things dote that." Amplified Rerecich. "It was just comparing the one column, which I believe is gross they did on the first day. whereas the ranges that came out, combined everything else. For a speaker dote that, the sound character is the highest-weighted, it's the most important, and the other ones affected it. So, the ranking that came out in the ratings could hold been slightly different from that first day, because that first day was just one component of the test.
Rerecich added that testing is not just about sound character for speakers, but too about ease of use, features, and overall versatility. Following those evaluations, the plenary report is issued.
Jerry Beilinson, Consumer Reports' content evolution team leader and electronics editor for the Consumer Reports magazine, argued that the assessment, written by CR's Allen St. John, wasn't actually gross that negative.
"Very noble sound, far better than most other speakers, one of the best. The dispute seems to subsist that [we said] it wasn't the best speaker that was ever released. It's recommended, it got a very noble rating, and was with very similar rating numbers, edged out by two similarly high-end competitors."A question of aesthetics
The Consumer Reports officials did point out one thing: Their testing process does not, formally, rob into account the recognize and aesthetics of the product. And design, it should depart without saying, is something historically very essential to Apple.
"We don't suffuse much about aesthetics," ticket Connelly, director of testing said during their tour of the facilities.
"We'll picture them sometimes," said Rerecich. "Maybe for a washing machine that's not so important, but for something dote a speaker that you might hold in your alive room, you might suffuse what it looks like. They don't rate it and drawl this one looks better than that one,' unless it's unusual in some way."
"Just to subsist clear, those are not section of the numerical rating, they don't win calculated as section of it," said Jerry Beilinson. "What Consumer Reports can Do for you is give you comparisons you can't accomplish yourself and judgments you can't easily accomplish yourself. So when you're in the store, what is the performance in terms of hasten of this laptop? Well I'm not going to recognize at it or read the spec but and necessarily know what is the battery life if a consumer is looking at a product they can recount whether they dote the artery it looks, they don't really exigency ConsumerReports or another outside authority to recount them whether they deem the blue one or red one is better-looking."
"That's not a artery in which a consumer might subsist lacking in information they exigency to accomplish the purchase," said Beilinson. "What we're really trying to do, primarily, is fill consumers in with information that they exigency to subsist able to accomplish noble choices."One side or another
We prize that Consumer Reports opened their doors to argue testing methodology, making the entire process a miniature more transparent. Based on their commenters, AppleInsider readers and car aficionados hold had a faith issue. Trust, once lost, is arduous to regain.
In the case of the "antennagate," the public-facing information was about the signal attenuation when the phone was held, with the comfort of the chronicle behind a paywall. A paywall is any publication's right, as bills Do hold to win paid, but the information that was propagated wasn't the gross chronicle —as the group did recommend the iPhone in that paid report.
With the 2016 MacBook Pro, Apple's declarations on the matter, and Consumer Reports silent differ. CR has clarified its stance on the matter to us now, and Apple has not beyond it being not a consumer setting —so the gross chronicle for users is somewhere in between. They silent feel that this should hold been addressed with Apple before publication of the initial test results, though.
Regarding the more recent HomePod and the audio comparison, AppleInsider silent believes that the comparison the identical day that the product was released wasn't handled well at all. Additionally, while an analysis in a vacuum of a product can subsist done rapidly, they Do not believe that any benevolent of meaningful comparison between tangled products dote the HomePod and Google Home Max that Consumer Reports aims to Do can subsist completed from start to publication in a matter of hours.
This gross said, there are a few things they conclude from their visit to Consumer Reports. Having viewed their testing process and met with their team, they are confident that they Do not harbor a purposeful anti-Apple agenda, nor is there any sort of cabal against Apple afoot behind the CR walls. Their complete testing and evaluation process is conducted with integrity and in noble faith.
However, there may very well subsist something about CR's analytical, numbers-driven process that clashes with the design-heavy Apple ethos, and makes their conclusions about Apple products different from those of more traditional reviewers. Even so, this hasn't stopped them from recommending most of Apple's lineup.
Miller, E. K. & Cohen, J. D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167–202 (2001).
Stuss, D. T. & Benson, D. F. The Frontal Lobes (Raven Press, novel York, 1986).
Miyake, A. et al. The union and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to tangled ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn. Psychol. 41, 49–100 (2000).
Taylor, C. A., Bell, J. M., Breiding, M. J. & Xu, L. Traumatic brain injury-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 66, 1–16 (2017).
Bang, J., Spina, S. & Miller, B. L. Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet 386, 1672–1682 (2015).
Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D. & Tranel, D. Neuropsychological Assessment (Oxford University Press, novel York, 2012).
Berg, E. A. A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J. Gen. Psychol. 39, 15–22 (1948).
Konishi, S. et al. Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. Brain 122, 981–991 (1999).
Monchi, O., Petrides, M., Petre, V., Worsley, K. & Dagher, A. Wisconsin card sorting revisited: several neural circuits participating in different stages of the assignment identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 21, 7733–7741 (2001).
Lie, C.-H., Specht, K., Marshall, J. C. & Fink, G. R. Using fMRI to decompose the neural processes underlying the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Neuroimage 30, 1038–1049 (2006).
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S. & Cohen, J. D. fight monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624–652 (2001).
Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D. & Carter, C. S. fight monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 539–546 (2004).
Buchsbaum, B. R., Greer, S., Chang, W. L. & Berman, K. F. Meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of the Wisconsin Card‐Sorting assignment and component processes. Hum. Brain. Mapp. 25, 35–45 (2005).
Berman, K. F. et al. Physiological activation of a cortical network during performance of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test - a positron emission tomography study. Neuropsychologia 33, 1027–1046 (1995).
Nyhus, E. & Barcelo, F. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the cognitive assessment of prefrontal executive functions: a captious update. Brain Cogn. 71, 437–451 (2009).
Wang, J., Cao, B., Cai, X., Gao, H. & Li, F. Brain activation of negative feedback in rule acquisition revealed in a segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. PLoS One 10, e0140731 (2015).
Friston, K. J. et al. The concern with cognitive subtraction. Neuroimage 4, 97–104 (1996).
Farrell, S. & Lewandowsky, S. in An Introduction to Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience (eds Forstmann, B. U. & Wagenmakers, E. J.) 3–24 (Springer, novel York, 2015).
Gläscher, J. P. & O’Doherty, J. P. Model-based approaches to neuroimaging: combining reinforcement learning theory with fMRI data. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.57 (2010). n/a–n/a.
Jiang, J., Beck, J., Heller, K. & Egner, T. An insula-frontostriatal network mediates resilient cognitive control by adaptively predicting changing control demands. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–11 (2015).
Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G. & Curtis, G. Wisonsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) Manual: Revised and Expanded (Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, 1993).
Eling, P., Derckx, K. & Maes, R. On the historical and conceptual background of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Brain Cogn. 67, 247–253 (2008).
Jurado, M. B. & Rosselli, M. The elusive nature of executive functions: a review of their current understanding. Neuropsychol. Rev. 17, 213–233 (2007).
Barcelo, F. & Knight, R. T. Both random and perseverative errors underlie WCST deficits in prefrontal patients. Neuropsychologia 40, 349–356 (2002).
Niv, Y. et al. Reinforcement learning in multidimensional environments relies on attention mechanisms. J. Neurosci. 35, 8145–8157 (2015).
Bornstein, R. A. Contribution of various neuropsychological measures to detection of frontal lobe impairment. Int. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 8, 18–22 (1986).
Stuss, D. T. et al. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes. Neuropsychologia 38, 388–402 (2000).
Goldstein, B., Obrzut, J. E., John, C., Ledakis, G. & Armstrong, C. L. The impact of frontal and non-frontal brain tumor lesions on Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance. Brain Cogn. 54, 110–116 (2004).
Drewe, E. A. The sequel of character and belt of brain lesion on Wisconsin card sorting test performance. Cortex 10, 159–170 (1974).
Milner, B. Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting - role of frontal lobes. Arch. Neurol. 9, 90 (1963). &.
Anderson, S. W., Damasio, H., JONES, R. D. & Tranel, D. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-performance as a measure of frontal-lobe damage. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 13, 909–922 (1991).
Jodzio, K. & Biechowska, D. Wisconsin card sorting test as a measure of executive role impairments in stroke patients. Appl. Neuropsychol. 17, 267–277 (2010).
Shallice, T. & Burgess, P. W. Deficits in strategy application following frontal-lobe damage in man. Brain 114, 727–741 (1991).
Grafman, J., Jonas, B. & Salazar, A. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance based on location and size of neuroanatomical lesion in Vietnam veterans with penetrating head injury. Percept. Mot. Skills 71, 1120–1122 (1990).
Rorden, C. & Karnath, H.-O. Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 813–819 (2004).
Rorden, C., Karnath, H.-O. & Bonilha, L. Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 1081–1088 (2007).
Rafal, R. D. Oculomotor functions of the parietal lobe: effects of inveterate lesions in humans. Cortex 42, 730–739 (2006).
Alvarez, J. A. & Emory, E. Executive role and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychol. Rev. 16, 17–42 (2006).
Robinson, A. L., Heaton, R. K., Lehman, R. A. & Stilson, D. W. The utility of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in detecting and localizing frontal lobe lesions. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 48, 605–614 (1980).
Gläscher, J. et al. Lesion mapping of cognitive control and value-based determination making in the prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206608109/-/DCSupplemental (2012).
Bishara, A. J. et al. Sequential learning models for the Wisconsin card sort task: assessing processes in core dependent individuals. J. Math. Psychol. 54, 5–13 (2010).
Gläscher, J. et al. Lesion mapping of cognitive abilities linked to intelligence. Neuron 61, 681–691 (2009).
Adolphs, R. Human lesion studies in the 21st century. Neuron 90, 1151–1153 (2016).
Mountain, M. A. & Snow, W. G. Wisconsin card sorting test as a measure of frontal pathology: a review. Clin. Neuropsychol. 7, 108–118 (1992).
Eslinger, P. J. & Damasio, A. R. stern disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal-lobe ablation: patient EVR. Neurology 35, 1731–1741 (1985).
Koechlin, E., Ody, C. & Kouneiher, F. The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science 302, 1181–1185 (2003).
Volz, H.-P. et al. Brain activation during cognitive stimulation with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test - a functional MRI study on well volunteers and schizophrenics. Psychiatry Res. 75, 145–157 (1997).
Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F. & Rangel, A. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science 324, 646–648 (2009).
Lenartowicz, A., Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D. & Poldrack, R. A. Inhibition-related activation in the prerogative inferior frontal gyrus in the absence of inhibitory cues. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 3388–3399 (2011).
Hampshire, A., Chamberlain, S. R., Monti, M. M., Duncan, J. & Owen, A. M. The role of the prerogative inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control. Neuroimage 50, 1313–1319 (2010).
Sutterer, M. J. et al. Canceled connections: lesion-derived network mapping helps justify differences in performance on a tangled decision-making task. Cortex 78, 31–43 (2016).
Sutterer, M. J. & Tranel, D. Neuropsychology and cognitive neuroscience in the fMRI era: a recapitulation of localizationist and connectionist views. Neuropsychology 31, 972–980 (2017).
Gläscher, J. et al. Distributed neural system for general intelligence revealed by lesion mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4705–4709 (2010).
Philippi, C. L., Mehta, S., Grabowski, T., Adolphs, R. & Rudrauf, D. Damage to association fiber tracts impairs recognition of the facial expression of emotion. J. Neurosci. 29, 15089–15099 (2009).
Gennarelli, T. A. Cerebral concussion and diffuse brain injuries. In Head Injury 2nd ed. (ed. Cooper, P. R.) 137–158 (Williams & Wilkin, Baltimore, 1987).
Verdon, V., Schwartz, S., Lovblad, K.-O., Hauert, C.-A. & Vuilleumier, P. Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain 133, 880–894 (2010).
Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Nozari, N., Faseyitan, O. & fork Coslett, H. Voxel-based lesion-parameter mapping: Identifying the neural correlates of a computational model of word production. Cognition 128, 380–396 (2013).
Friston, K. J. & Price, C. J. Degeneracy and redundancy in cognitive anatomy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 151–152 (2003).
Mah, Y.-H., Husain, M., Rees, G. & Nachev, P. Human brain lesion-deficit inference remapped. Brain 137, 2522–2531 (2014).
Smith, D. V., Clithero, J. A., Rorden, C. & Karnath, H.-O. Decoding the anatomical network of spatial attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1518–1523 (2013).
Pustina, D., Avants, B., Faseyitan, O. K., Medaglia, J. D. & Coslett, H. B. Improved accuracy of lesion to symptom mapping with multivariate sparse canonical correlations. Neuropsychologia 115, 154–166 (2018).
Keinan, A., Kaufman, A., Sachs, N., Hilgetag, C. C. & Ruppin, E. just localization of role via multi-lesion analysis. Neuroinform 2, 163–168 (2004).
Zavaglia, M. & Hilgetag, C. C. Causal functional contributions and interactions in the attention network of the brain: an objective multi-perturbation analysis. Brain Struct. Funct. 221, 2553–2568 (2015).
Montague, P. R., Dolan, R. J., Friston, K. J. & Dayan, P. Computational psychiatry. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 72–80 (2012).
Ahn, W.-Y., Krawitz, A., Kim, W., Busemeyer, J. R. & Brown, J. W. A model-based fMRI analysis with hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation. J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ. 4, 95–110 (2011).
Plummer, M. JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria, 2003).
Frank, R. J., Damasio, H. & Grabowski, T. J. Brainvox: an interactive, multimodal visualization and analysis system for neuroanatomical imaging. Neuroimage 5, 13–30 (1997).
Bates, E. et al. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 448–450 (2003).
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/202-400
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11314973
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-6R
weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000MUUE
Scribd : https://www.scribd.com/document/356131325/Pass4sure-202-400-LPIC-2-Exam-202-Part-2-of-2-version-4-0-exam-braindumps-with-real-questions-and-practice-software
Youtube : https://youtu.be/T0EeANslrC8
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11982439
Vimeo : https://vimeo.com/238014717
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2017/10/never-miss-these-202-400-questions.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/NeverMissThese202-400QuestionsBeforeYouGoForTest
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/look-at-these-202-400-real-question-and-answers
Google+ : https://plus.google.com/112153555852933435691/posts/2sEtaZBePRz?hl=en
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/books/004923526b066f87a22b3
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/53uowbaf7cb8db9934d64b6fafa497a0153d5
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/62peoslbwf4xakyudz9jg4e3whl2xrf5